Volume of a SphereObjective: To confirm the formula for the volume of a sphere.This lab will follow lab on the density of water
Joseph M. Kovaz and Brian Travis 01/23/03 Title: Measuring the Volume of a Sphere Materials: 1 plastic/glass globe with a hole (Christmas tree ball ornament), string, meter stick, water, graduated cylinder, scale Introduction: In this experiment, it was assumed that the density of H or 1.00 g/ml (because 1 ml = 1 cm 3). The theoretical density P of water is 0.998e3 kg/m3.It was also assumed that the volume of a sphere is given by the relationship V = 4/3 ¹ r 3where r is the radius of the sphere. Because density P = M/V, the volume of a sphere could be calculated if the mass of the volume of water within the sphere was measured. The volume of a sphere could also be calculated using the formula V = 4/3 ¹ r 3 if theradius was determined. This radius could be approximated by measuring the circumference of the sphere at its widest cross-section and then calculating the radius using the relationship: circumference C = 2 ¹ r. The 2 calculated volumes were then compared with the theoretical volume to find the percent error. The theoretical volume was determined by measuring the volume of water inside the sphere by pouring it into a graduated cylinder. The theoretical volume was measured to be 153 ml. The 2 calculated volumes were also compared to find the percent difference. Procedure: The glass globe (Christmas tree ornament) was rinsed out. The mass was measured on a scale and determined to be 9.33 g. The mass of a Styrofoam cup (which would be used to hold the globe upright when it was filled with water) was measured on a scale and determined to be 6.76 g. The globe was then filled with water to the base of its "spout." It was carefully placed in the Styrofoam cup. The cup and globe containing water were then placed on the scale and the total mass was determined to be 166.71 g. The masses of the cup and globe were then subtracted from the total mass to calculate the mass of the water which was determined to be 150.62 g. Density is given by the relationship P = M/V. Density of water is assumed to be 1.00 g/ml, thus the experimental volume of the sphere was calculated to be 150.62 ml. Next, the water in the sphere was carefully poured into a graduated cylinder to determine the actual volume and was measured to be 153.0 ml. Finally, the circumference of the sphere was measured using a piece of string and a meter stick. The string was wrapped around the largest cross sectional area of the sphere and marked. The marked string was then straightened and measured with a meter stick. The circumference was thus measured to be 21.0 cm. The circumference of a circle is given by the relationship C = 2 ¹ r. The radius can thus be calculated as r = C/2 ¹ and was determined to be 3.34 cm. It was assumed that the volume of a sphere is given by the relationship V = 4/3 ¹ r 3. Inserting the value for the radius, the volume was calculated tobe 156.07 cm 3 or 156.07 ml.Results: The data for the experiment is given in a table below: 1 st Trial measuring the mass of the water:
2nd Trial measuring the radius of the sphere:
Actual Volume = 153.0 ml (measuring volume of H2O using graduated cylinder)Percent error = [(Experimental Volume Actual Volume)/Actual Volume] x 100% Percent difference = [(E 1 E2)/((E1 + E2)/2)] x 100%Percent error in 1 st trial -1.6%Percent error in 2 nd trial 2.0%Percent difference 3.6% Conclusion: The results of this experiment were as predicted. The percent error in both trials was relatively small considering the equipment used and the sources for error. The measurements were taken fairly roughly and great care was not taken in precision. The basic idea of the experiment was evident in the results. The sources of error in the first trial were in the amount of water in the globe and in the way in which the water was weighed. The water had to be filled exactly to the point below the base of the "spout" or hole in the globe so that it occupied exactly the volume of the sphere, not more or less. In the second trial, the way in which the circumference was measured was not exact. It was impossible to determine the exact location of the largest cross-sectional area. When comparing the results of the 2 trials, it is evident that the first trial measured the internal volume of the sphere, where the second trial measured the external volume of the sphere. The thickness of the glass would create differences in the 2 measurements for volume. Finally, the actual volume of the water inside the sphere was not measured with extreme precision as a 25 ml graduated cylinder was used. By filling the cylinder 7 times, there were many opportunities to create error in measurement. |